Scores and Comments
19.c.pr.200.167
Brevard Nature Alliance
Application Details |
|
|---|---|
| Proposal Type | Specific Cultural Project - Arts In Education |
| Request Amount |
$19,000
|
| Total Score | 495.000 |
| Average Score | 82.500 |
Panelist Scores
| Panelist | Excellence | Impact | Management | Accessibility | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emilia Maria | 34 | 25 | 10 | 8 | 77 |
| Engerran Kathy | 33 | 27 | 17 | 7 | 84 |
| Johnson Linda | 36 | 28 | 19 | 7 | 90 |
| Ruley Suzanne | 31 | 25 | 15 | 1 | 72 |
| Turrell Nancy | 30 | 23 | 18 | 8 | 79 |
| Webber Emma | 35 | 30 | 20 | 8 | 93 |
Comments |
|
|---|---|
| Emilia Maria - Score: 77.000 | |
|
Excellent description of previous activities, events and results but only brief statements about this grant's activities, marketing and timelines. Appears to be missing the Management and Operating Budget section |
|
| Engerran Kathy - Score: 84.000 | |
| {No comments provided.} | |
| Johnson Linda - Score: 90.000 | |
| {No comments provided.} | |
| Ruley Suzanne - Score: 72.000 | |
|
Extensive economic impact. Where is the art? I see 120 artists participating and several art partners but I see no art activities. |
|
| Turrell Nancy - Score: 79.000 | |
|
How are partners engaged? It’s a long list but no information about how or what the partnerships entail. The arts element of this grant is underrepresented and not presented in a way that I feel an arts grant application should be. I don’t have any concerns about the festival itself, but rather in the detailing of the arts are a vital element of the overall project. Reading between the lines or assuming where the arts are included just isn’t enough to qualify for funding. |
|
| Webber Emma - Score: 93.000 | |
|
|