Scores and Comments
19.c.ps.114.652
Florida Arts, Inc.
Application Details |
|
---|---|
Proposal Type | General Program Support - Discipline-Based |
Request Amount |
$90,000
|
Total Score | 506.000 |
Average Score | 84.333 |
Panelist Scores
Panelist | Excellence | Impact | Management | Accessibility | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balog Scott | 35 | 26 | 17 | 8 | 86 |
Betancourt Javier | 40 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 90 |
Grundy-Lester Gabrielle | 36 | 26 | 18 | 7 | 87 |
Hudson-Smith Suzanne | 33 | 24 | 18 | 9 | 84 |
Suau John | 28 | 23 | 15 | 9 | 75 |
Vickery Clare | 35 | 25 | 15 | 9 | 84 |
Comments |
|
---|---|
Balog Scott - Score: 86.000 | |
{No comments provided.} | |
Betancourt Javier - Score: 90.000 | |
Good objectives; decent partnerships; lots of artists; proposal impact mostly economic; budget is specific with line detail; great accessibility statement with diversity; CONCERNS: could use more detail on art and artists; more detail on work with the schools, what are the sources for the economic impact data? $2.5 million? what is the exact estimate of outreach programs? ("many thousands"); what private donors / corporate sponsors are engaged? evaluation program could use more specificity |
|
Grundy-Lester Gabrielle - Score: 87.000 | |
{No comments provided.} | |
Hudson-Smith Suzanne - Score: 84.000 | |
{No comments provided.} | |
Suau John - Score: 75.000 | |
Goals are not differentiated from objectives. Not a clear understanding of the difference. Not a clear statement of impact. No economic or educational impact addressed. Evaluation plan very general and not tied to specific goals or objectives.
Although some good methods to evaluate, but not clear on how this will evaluate objectives and goals. |
|
Vickery Clare - Score: 84.000 | |
It would be nice to see examples of work completed and/or presented by the organization including video. So we could see the quality of the art bring prepared and shown. The grant was kind of scant on details for the amount of money being requested. The website is nicely done. |