Scores and Comments
19.c.ps.114.611
Miami Center for Architecture & Design, Inc.
Application Details |
|
|---|---|
| Proposal Type | General Program Support - Discipline-Based |
| Request Amount |
$25,000
|
| Total Score | 484.000 |
| Average Score | 80.667 |
Panelist Scores
| Panelist | Excellence | Impact | Management | Accessibility | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balog Scott | 32 | 24 | 16 | 8 | 80 |
| Betancourt Javier | 24 | 22 | 16 | 4 | 66 |
| Grundy-Lester Gabrielle | 32 | 28 | 20 | 7 | 87 |
| Hudson-Smith Suzanne | 34 | 25 | 17 | 9 | 85 |
| Suau John | 33 | 23 | 13 | 9 | 78 |
| Vickery Clare | 33 | 30 | 17 | 8 | 88 |
Comments |
|
|---|---|
| Balog Scott - Score: 80.000 | |
| {No comments provided.} | |
| Betancourt Javier - Score: 66.000 | |
|
The organization has a unique focus on active design and architecture. CONCERNS: The proposal is vague and lacks details. Lacks specificity on activities, collaborations, no detail on partner roles, very few youth impacted (100 total proposed), no inclusion, very limited and perfunctory accessibility plan, vague sustainability does not adequately name procedures and sources of diverse funding, vague marketing plan. Art & culture implementations are not specified. Not information provided on activities to adequately describe what the project is in tending to accomplish. |
|
| Grundy-Lester Gabrielle - Score: 87.000 | |
| It is quite disappointing to have organization lose points because a representative did not make the time to participate in the review process. This was a strong proposal, especially for first time applicant, which made it difficult to deduct points. It would be a good practice to have someone be a part of the review, moving forward. Initially 6 points had been deducted, but 2 were added after a representative joined the panel. As a result, the final points deducted totaled 4 under the management category. | |
| Hudson-Smith Suzanne - Score: 85.000 | |
| {No comments provided.} | |
| Suau John - Score: 78.000 | |
|
Need detailed information on impact to the community and the economy. What is the rubric for evaluation. This cannot be evaluated without a rubric or standard to evaluate against. What determines success. What number of things determine success? |
|
| Vickery Clare - Score: 88.000 | |
| Very cool organization making important steps towards elevating the importance of architecture and design in public life and connection to art community. Would like to have seen more examples of design education which is sorely needed. Like the allocation to mostly creative professionals. | |