Scores and Comments
19.c.ps.101.018
The Dance Now! Ensemble, Inc.
Application Details |
|
---|---|
Proposal Type | General Program Support - Discipline-Based |
Request Amount |
$40,000
|
Total Score | 464.000 |
Average Score | 92.800 |
Panelist Scores
Panelist | Excellence | Impact | Management | Accessibility | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Andree Dale | 37 | 29 | 20 | 10 | 96 |
Davis Tenaj | 40 | 30 | 20 | 10 | 100 |
Jenkins David | 37 | 25 | 19 | 9 | 90 |
Klein Kathleen | 38 | 30 | 17 | 8 | 93 |
Schnell Adam | 33 | 27 | 16 | 9 | 85 |
Comments |
|
---|---|
Andree Dale - Score: 96.000 | |
The grant materials are excellent and articulate every aspect of their project clearly.This is a company that is committed to its mission and to realizing it. | |
Davis Tenaj - Score: 100.000 | |
perfect example! |
|
Jenkins David - Score: 90.000 | |
Very well-written, clear, cogent, and enlightening narrative. I am very excited to hear about the site-specific free performances and your artistic vision and passion behind them. GREAT list of partnerships, and I applaud your inclusion across disciplines. Solid specificity in how your organization directly impacts LH. Clear evaluation plan. This is a very solid proposal, one comment for you (and pretty much every other applicant) is just a suggestion to cite your support materials in the narrative to pique adjudicator interest and contextualize your narrative claims. I love your website! |
|
Klein Kathleen - Score: 93.000 | |
Excellent company! Collaborative efforts with other organizations Fabulous press |
|
Schnell Adam - Score: 85.000 | |
While I applaud the efforts of this organization, this application lacked focus and clarity. I understand that you have many programs, but it was very difficult to figure out what the organization was all about. In this case detail, both within the application, and within the support materials, did not lend to understanding or readability. The first half of the application seemed also to have suffered from a lack of proofreading. |