Scores and Comments
19.c.ps.114.496
Blue Planet Global Education, Inc.
Application Details |
|
---|---|
Proposal Type | General Program Support - Discipline-Based |
Request Amount |
$21,000
|
Total Score | 670.000 |
Average Score | 95.714 |
Panelist Scores
Panelist | Excellence | Impact | Management | Accessibility | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dohrman Kimberly | 39 | 30 | 20 | 10 | 99 |
Gunter Ben | 40 | 30 | 19 | 10 | 99 |
Kolenic Anthony | 39 | 28 | 19 | 10 | 96 |
Mitchell Susan | 38 | 28 | 18 | 8 | 92 |
Moore Regina | 38 | 28 | 19 | 9 | 94 |
Schlehr Aimee | 37 | 28 | 18 | 8 | 91 |
Winter Pioneer | 40 | 29 | 20 | 10 | 99 |
Comments |
|
---|---|
Dohrman Kimberly - Score: 99.000 | |
Amazing project! Great work that is much needed. | |
Gunter Ben - Score: 99.000 | |
I enjoyed your website. The home page paints a dynamic picture of connection and diversity. The program description is impressively visionary and well-written. Have you organized (or do you aspire to offer) units exploring art forms in addition to writing, visual art, and drama? The program seems well-suited, for example, to sharing experience through songs and dances. There are notable shifts in your budget where commentary would be welcome -- e.g., the 100%+ jump on line 2 (personnel: programmatic), the 300% jump on line 6 (rent), the 50% reduction on line 11 (revenue from contracted services), and even the big increase on line 14 (private support: foundation, most of which is explained in budget detail later). Comments in "Fiscal Condition" narrative could elucidate. The video is magic. Thoroughly enjoyed the shadow puppets, and the way this well-produced clip illustrates your process. The proposal you've submitted is elegantly mission-driven -- and your mission is persuasively stated and impressively connected with high-profile studies. Clearly, you have a vision for making art that nurtures "qualities that form the underpinnings of international cooperation and peace." Write on! |
|
Kolenic Anthony - Score: 96.000 | |
E: Very clear objectives, goals, activities; detailed partnerships; clear timeline; some concern present about the ratio of "products" or processes that are arts-based or following a particular cultural theory/practice, as opposed to general prompt-based activity.
I: Strong demographic reach and appropriate opportunity to individual ratio; clearly laid out and defined.
M: Good external support record; very strong evaluation methods, though not clear what thresholds define success or what the exact learning outcomes are.
A: Excellent |
|
Mitchell Susan - Score: 92.000 | |
As enthused as I am about the international exchange (and how do you deal with the very real differences in time zones?) I would really like to know more about the local projects aimed at at-risk and incarcerated youth. You might consider including this in future proposals. Your accessibility section does not address special accommodations for participants who have vision or hearing impairments. |
|
Moore Regina - Score: 94.000 | |
Beautiful program! I was just wondering, in the measurable objectives, why 75% of students are able to improve their writing and artistic skills or increase their knowledge about other cultures. What happen to the 25% of children who cannot improve their skills? | |
Schlehr Aimee - Score: 91.000 | |
Goals, objectives and activities clearly identified. Interesting project and very good application. |
|
Winter Pioneer - Score: 99.000 | |
Excellent promo video! |